“We filed this notice of appeal because we disagree with the court’s decision and must hold Facebook accountable for stifling competition, reducing innovation, and cutting privacy protections,” New York’s attorney general Letitia James said, according to . “We can no longer allow Facebook to profit off of exploiting consumer data.”
The suit, which was filed in December, alleged that Facebook created a monopoly and illegally stifled competition through its acquisitions of and . Judge James E. Boasberg of the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that too much time had gone by since the mergers were approved for the case to proceed.
On the same day he dismissed the AGs’ suit, Boasberg tossed a similar case from the Federal Trade Commission. The agency is expected to file an amended suit next month.
The FTC lawsuit was initially filed in December while Trump administration appointee Joseph Simons led the agency. Big Tech critic Lina Khan was . Facebook has to recuse her from antitrust decisions involving the company.
Facebook has argued against both suits, claiming much of the evidence in the cases was submitted to the FTC before the purchases of Instagram and WhatsApp were rubberstamped. It also claims it doesn’t have a monopoly, partly due to competition from the likes of Snap and Twitter, as well as messaging apps.
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.